Construction & Real Estate Insights

The construction industry is heading into 2026 with a mixed bag, and at Alliance Solutions Group, we've been watching these shifts closely.

Every year, we dig into the data from the Associated General Contractors of America and Sage's annual Construction Hiring and Business Outlook to understand where the industry is headed. This year's report, titled Dampened Expectations, tells an honest story: there's real demand out there, but the landscape has gotten more complicated.

Data centers and power facilities are surging. Five market segments have flipped to negative expectations, up from just two last year. Sixty-two percent of firms say recession risk is their top concern. And the labor shortage? It's not getting easier. Eighty-two percent of contractors are struggling to fill craft positions.

For contractors, the question isn't whether there's work. It's whether your business is set up to manage the complexity that comes with it.

Here's what we're paying attention to, and what we think you should be thinking about, too.

Data Centers Are Booming. That Doesn't Make Them Simple.

The biggest headline in this year's outlook is the continued surge in data center demand. According to the AGC and Sage report, data centers posted a net reading of 57 percent, the highest of any market segment and the only one to see double-digit growth from a year ago. Power facilities came in second at 34 percent, and those two segments are the only categories where contractor confidence actually increased compared to last year.

The demand is real, and it's being driven by AI, cloud computing, and the broader expansion of digital infrastructure.

But here's the part of this story that doesn't always get enough attention: data centers are resource-intensive in ways that directly affect the communities where they're built. They require significant energy, large volumes of water for cooling, substantial land, and major infrastructure investment. As these projects multiply, the conversations around them are getting bigger, and rightly so. Communities are asking harder questions about environmental impact, strain on local utilities, long-term sustainability, and who bears the cost of supporting these facilities.

As a firm that works closely with contractors, we think this matters. Growth is good, but not if it comes without careful planning.

For contractors, data center work can be a real opportunity, but it also demands strong cost controls, accurate forecasting, and clear visibility into project performance from day one. These are complex, resource-heavy projects, and the margin for error is smaller than it might look from the outside.

The takeaway isn't just that data centers are a growth area. It's that the kind of work driving demand right now requires contractors to manage risk more carefully than ever.

The Rest of the Market? Contractors Are Playing It Cautious.

While data centers and power projects are running hot, the broader picture is more guarded.

The AGC report shows that five market segments now carry negative net expectations, up from just two in last year's survey. Retail, private office, and hotel construction are seeing the weakest outlook. And even the segments that are still expected to grow, like healthcare, manufacturing, water and sewer, are seeing lower confidence compared to a year ago.

That said, contractors aren't sitting on their hands. Nearly 40 percent report backlogs that are bigger than a year ago, and 63 percent still plan to add workers this year. The work is there. But firms are being more selective about the work they take on and more focused on protecting their margins.

From where we sit, this is actually the right instinct. When the market shifts, the contractors who come out ahead aren't the ones chasing every opportunity. They're the ones who know exactly which projects are profitable, where costs are moving, and how fast they need to act on financial decisions. That kind of clarity doesn't come from spreadsheets updated once a month. It comes from having real-time visibility into your numbers.

Economic Uncertainty Isn't Going Away

If there's one theme that runs through this entire outlook, it's uncertainty.

Sixty-two percent of contractors cited an economic slowdown or recession as their top concern for 2026. That's not a small number. And it's compounded by everything else on the list: tariff policies that keep shifting, tighter project financing, rising material costs, and immigration enforcement pressures that are affecting labor availability in certain regions.

The AGC report also notes that many firms have already seen owners postpone, scale back, or cancel projects. That's the kind of environment where one delayed decision or one missed cost trend can ripple through a contractor's entire pipeline.

We talk to construction firms every day, and what we hear is that the challenge isn't just winning work. It's understanding whether the work is financially sound before you commit to it. That requires up-to-date job cost data, connected reporting, and systems that let leadership act on current information rather than catching problems after the fact.

If your financial data lives in disconnected spreadsheets or your reports are running weeks behind, that's not just an inconvenience. In this kind of environment, it's a real business risk.

The Labor Shortage Is Still Squeezing the Industry

The skilled labor shortage has been a headline for years now, and 2026 is no exception.

According to the AGC and Sage report, 82 percent of firms are having difficulty filling hourly craft positions, and 80 percent are struggling with salaried roles. Those are the highest numbers in the past three years. And 63 percent of firms still plan to grow their headcount, which means the competition for qualified workers is only going to intensify.

When your teams are stretched thin, every inefficient process costs you more. It costs you in time, in errors, and in the energy your people spend on work that could be automated or streamlined. Whether it's project accounting, approvals, payroll, or field reporting, the processes that still rely on manual entry are the ones most likely to slow your team down and introduce mistakes.

We've seen this firsthand with the contractors we work with. When firms invest in reducing the manual burden on their teams, they don't just save time. They create room for their people to focus on the work that actually moves projects forward.

AI Investment Is Accelerating, But the Foundation Matters

One of the most striking findings in this year's report is how quickly AI adoption is growing in construction.

Sixty-one percent of firms now say they're either using AI or planning to increase their investment in it, up from 44 percent just a year ago. That's a significant jump. Contractors are putting AI to work across administrative functions (45 percent), estimating (23 percent), design and preconstruction (20 percent), and recruiting and training (16 percent).

This isn't a trend that's going to slow down. But here's what we keep coming back to in our conversations with clients: AI is only as good as the data and systems underneath it.

If your financial data is scattered across disconnected tools, if your reporting processes are manual, if your accounting system wasn't built for the way construction actually works, then layering AI on top of that isn't going to solve the underlying problem. It's going to amplify the gaps.

The firms that are getting the most out of technology right now are the ones that invested in a solid cloud-based foundation first. Centralized data, connected workflows, clean reporting. That's the groundwork that makes everything else, including AI, actually useful.

What We Think This All Means

The 2026 outlook is complicated. Some segments are thriving, others are pulling back. The labor market is tight. Costs are unpredictable. Owners are cautious. And at the same time, the pace of technology adoption is accelerating.

For construction leaders, this is a moment to step back and honestly assess whether the systems behind your business are keeping up with the demands in front of you.

Can you see your financial performance clearly and in real time? Do you know which projects are making money and which ones aren't? Can your teams get what they need without chasing down spreadsheets or waiting on manual reports? Are you positioned to adopt new technology when it makes sense, or will outdated infrastructure hold you back?

These aren't hypothetical questions. They're the ones that separate the firms that navigate years like this successfully from the ones that spend the whole time reacting.

At Alliance Solutions Group, this is the work we do every day. We help construction businesses modernize the financial and operational systems that everything else depends on, from Sage Intacct Construction to connected solutions that support reporting, project visibility, and workflow efficiency. Our goal is to help contractors build a foundation that's strong enough for what's coming, not just what's here today.

If any of what you've read here hits close to home, we'd love to have a conversation.

The data referenced in this article comes from the AGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook report. You can read the full report here.

‍

The construction industry is heading into 2026 with a mixed bag, and at Alliance Solutions Group, we've been watching these shifts closely.

Every year, we dig into the data from the Associated General Contractors of America and Sage's annual Construction Hiring and Business Outlook to understand where the industry is headed. This year's report, titled Dampened Expectations, tells an honest story: there's real demand out there, but the landscape has gotten more complicated.

Data centers and power facilities are surging. Five market segments have flipped to negative expectations, up from just two last year. Sixty-two percent of firms say recession risk is their top concern. And the labor shortage? It's not getting easier. Eighty-two percent of contractors are struggling to fill craft positions.

For contractors, the question isn't whether there's work. It's whether your business is set up to manage the complexity that comes with it.

Here's what we're paying attention to, and what we think you should be thinking about, too.

Data Centers Are Booming. That Doesn't Make Them Simple.

The biggest headline in this year's outlook is the continued surge in data center demand. According to the AGC and Sage report, data centers posted a net reading of 57 percent, the highest of any market segment and the only one to see double-digit growth from a year ago. Power facilities came in second at 34 percent, and those two segments are the only categories where contractor confidence actually increased compared to last year.

The demand is real, and it's being driven by AI, cloud computing, and the broader expansion of digital infrastructure.

But here's the part of this story that doesn't always get enough attention: data centers are resource-intensive in ways that directly affect the communities where they're built. They require significant energy, large volumes of water for cooling, substantial land, and major infrastructure investment. As these projects multiply, the conversations around them are getting bigger, and rightly so. Communities are asking harder questions about environmental impact, strain on local utilities, long-term sustainability, and who bears the cost of supporting these facilities.

As a firm that works closely with contractors, we think this matters. Growth is good, but not if it comes without careful planning.

For contractors, data center work can be a real opportunity, but it also demands strong cost controls, accurate forecasting, and clear visibility into project performance from day one. These are complex, resource-heavy projects, and the margin for error is smaller than it might look from the outside.

The takeaway isn't just that data centers are a growth area. It's that the kind of work driving demand right now requires contractors to manage risk more carefully than ever.

The Rest of the Market? Contractors Are Playing It Cautious.

While data centers and power projects are running hot, the broader picture is more guarded.

The AGC report shows that five market segments now carry negative net expectations, up from just two in last year's survey. Retail, private office, and hotel construction are seeing the weakest outlook. And even the segments that are still expected to grow, like healthcare, manufacturing, water and sewer, are seeing lower confidence compared to a year ago.

That said, contractors aren't sitting on their hands. Nearly 40 percent report backlogs that are bigger than a year ago, and 63 percent still plan to add workers this year. The work is there. But firms are being more selective about the work they take on and more focused on protecting their margins.

From where we sit, this is actually the right instinct. When the market shifts, the contractors who come out ahead aren't the ones chasing every opportunity. They're the ones who know exactly which projects are profitable, where costs are moving, and how fast they need to act on financial decisions. That kind of clarity doesn't come from spreadsheets updated once a month. It comes from having real-time visibility into your numbers.

Economic Uncertainty Isn't Going Away

If there's one theme that runs through this entire outlook, it's uncertainty.

Sixty-two percent of contractors cited an economic slowdown or recession as their top concern for 2026. That's not a small number. And it's compounded by everything else on the list: tariff policies that keep shifting, tighter project financing, rising material costs, and immigration enforcement pressures that are affecting labor availability in certain regions.

The AGC report also notes that many firms have already seen owners postpone, scale back, or cancel projects. That's the kind of environment where one delayed decision or one missed cost trend can ripple through a contractor's entire pipeline.

We talk to construction firms every day, and what we hear is that the challenge isn't just winning work. It's understanding whether the work is financially sound before you commit to it. That requires up-to-date job cost data, connected reporting, and systems that let leadership act on current information rather than catching problems after the fact.

If your financial data lives in disconnected spreadsheets or your reports are running weeks behind, that's not just an inconvenience. In this kind of environment, it's a real business risk.

The Labor Shortage Is Still Squeezing the Industry

The skilled labor shortage has been a headline for years now, and 2026 is no exception.

According to the AGC and Sage report, 82 percent of firms are having difficulty filling hourly craft positions, and 80 percent are struggling with salaried roles. Those are the highest numbers in the past three years. And 63 percent of firms still plan to grow their headcount, which means the competition for qualified workers is only going to intensify.

When your teams are stretched thin, every inefficient process costs you more. It costs you in time, in errors, and in the energy your people spend on work that could be automated or streamlined. Whether it's project accounting, approvals, payroll, or field reporting, the processes that still rely on manual entry are the ones most likely to slow your team down and introduce mistakes.

We've seen this firsthand with the contractors we work with. When firms invest in reducing the manual burden on their teams, they don't just save time. They create room for their people to focus on the work that actually moves projects forward.

AI Investment Is Accelerating, But the Foundation Matters

One of the most striking findings in this year's report is how quickly AI adoption is growing in construction.

Sixty-one percent of firms now say they're either using AI or planning to increase their investment in it, up from 44 percent just a year ago. That's a significant jump. Contractors are putting AI to work across administrative functions (45 percent), estimating (23 percent), design and preconstruction (20 percent), and recruiting and training (16 percent).

This isn't a trend that's going to slow down. But here's what we keep coming back to in our conversations with clients: AI is only as good as the data and systems underneath it.

If your financial data is scattered across disconnected tools, if your reporting processes are manual, if your accounting system wasn't built for the way construction actually works, then layering AI on top of that isn't going to solve the underlying problem. It's going to amplify the gaps.

The firms that are getting the most out of technology right now are the ones that invested in a solid cloud-based foundation first. Centralized data, connected workflows, clean reporting. That's the groundwork that makes everything else, including AI, actually useful.

What We Think This All Means

The 2026 outlook is complicated. Some segments are thriving, others are pulling back. The labor market is tight. Costs are unpredictable. Owners are cautious. And at the same time, the pace of technology adoption is accelerating.

For construction leaders, this is a moment to step back and honestly assess whether the systems behind your business are keeping up with the demands in front of you.

Can you see your financial performance clearly and in real time? Do you know which projects are making money and which ones aren't? Can your teams get what they need without chasing down spreadsheets or waiting on manual reports? Are you positioned to adopt new technology when it makes sense, or will outdated infrastructure hold you back?

These aren't hypothetical questions. They're the ones that separate the firms that navigate years like this successfully from the ones that spend the whole time reacting.

At Alliance Solutions Group, this is the work we do every day. We help construction businesses modernize the financial and operational systems that everything else depends on, from Sage Intacct Construction to connected solutions that support reporting, project visibility, and workflow efficiency. Our goal is to help contractors build a foundation that's strong enough for what's coming, not just what's here today.

If any of what you've read here hits close to home, we'd love to have a conversation.

The data referenced in this article comes from the AGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook report. You can read the full report here.

‍

Why Your Service Department Looks Profitable But Isn’t

A specialty contractor’s controller pulls the monthly P\&L. The service department margin reads 18%. The president is happy. The service manager is happy. The board is happy. Everybody moves on.

Six months later, the company runs a true cost analysis on the service business. Once unbilled labor hours, mis-coded materials, parts pulled from inventory without job allocation, and service contracts that ended up under-billed are all accounted for, the actual service department margin reads 11%.

ViewReported marginWhat’s includedMonthly P\&L18%Only revenue that got billed against cost that got charged to that jobTrue cost analysis11%Unbilled labor, mis-coded materials, under-billed contracts, untracked parts

Seven points of margin were never in the books.

This is the service profitability problem most specialty contractors are running on. The service department looks profitable because the P\&L is reporting captured revenue against captured cost. Across the specialty contractor service businesses Alliance Solutions Group has worked with, the actual profitability picture is typically 4 to 8 points lower than what the P\&L shows.

Here is where the gap comes from, why it shows up in service work specifically, and what the contractors who close it are doing differently.

Why the Service P\&L Lies

The service department P\&L looks profitable for a specific reason: it only reports what got billed. The work that didn’t make it to the invoice never shows up as a margin drag, because it never shows up at all.

What the P\&L sees vs. what’s actually happening:

What the P\&L seesWhat’s actually happeningJob shows completeSome hours never made it to a ticketRevenue shows billedSome service tickets billed in the wrong periodMaterial cost looks normalMaterials landed on the wrong jobService contracts look profitableSome entitlements were over- or under-billed

The P\&L is doing its job. The job of the P\&L is to report what happened in the financial system. The problem is what doesn’t make it into the financial system. For service work, that gap is larger than for any other mode of work a specialty contractor runs.

Service work runs on per-call billing, time and materials, flat-rate billing, or contract entitlements. The cost data flows in from technicians in the field. Parts flow out of inventory across multiple trucks and warehouses. The reconciliation between work performed, cost incurred, and revenue billed depends on a dozen small handoffs every day, each of which is a potential leak point.

Install work and recurring maintenance leak too. Service work leaks worse because the transaction volume is higher and the billing cycles are tighter. A specialty contractor’s service department can run hundreds of small transactions per week. Even a small percentage of leakage on each one compounds into real margin loss across a quarter.

The Five Places Service Margin Leaks

Five specific gaps absorb most of the margin loss in service work. None are unusual. Every specialty contractor running a service business has dealt with all five.

1. Technician hours that never get billed. A technician finishes a service call at 4 p.m., enters time three days later, and bills the customer for two hours instead of three. The hour is gone. Service work generates more billable hours per day than any other mode, which means time capture accuracy is the single biggest lever in service profitability.  
2. Parts pulled from trucks without job allocation. A technician pulls parts from the truck, completes the work, drives to the next call without recording where the parts went. The cost hits inventory expense, but no specific job got charged. The service customer is billed for labor only or for an estimated parts charge that may or may not reflect actual cost.  
3. Service tickets billed in the wrong period. Work performed at the end of a billing cycle does not always make it onto the customer’s invoice until the next cycle. Revenue recognition lags. For service contracts with monthly billing, the timing error compounds into a meaningful AR aging issue and a margin distortion that takes months to surface.  
4. Contract entitlements not enforced. A service contract includes specific entitlements: monthly preventive maintenance visits, a set number of emergency response calls per year, parts replacement against a covered list. When work performed exceeds the entitlement and isn’t flagged, the customer gets the work for free. When work falls under the entitlement and the contract is billed at the full rate anyway, the customer eventually catches it and disputes the invoice.  
5. Recurring service work that loses cost discipline over time. A service customer signed five years ago at a profitable rate may now be unprofitable because labor costs rose, material costs rose, or scope expanded informally. Without periodic profitability reviews tied to clean job cost data, unprofitable customers stay on the books.

Each gap individually looks small. Together, across a real service business, they typically account for the 4-to-8 point margin gap between the P\&L and the actual profitability picture.

For a closer look at how job costing visibility surfaces this kind of margin risk before it shows up at month-end, see Financial Visibility for Electrical Contractors: Understanding Job Costing and Margin Risk and Electrical Contractor Job Cost Reporting: Why Budget vs Actual Isn’t Enough.

What 4 to 8 Points of Margin Recovery Is Worth

The financial impact is larger than most specialty contractors estimate, for the same reason the gap itself is invisible. The losses are distributed across thousands of small transactions rather than concentrated in any single event.

How the math scales by service business size, assuming a reported margin of 18% and a true margin 4 to 8 points lower:

Service business sizeReported margin (18%)Real margin (10–14%)Annual gapRecoverable per year$5M$900K$500K–$700K$200K–$400K$200K–$400K$15M$2.7M$1.5M–$2.1M$600K–$1.2M$600K–$1.2M$30M$5.4M$3.0M–$4.2M$1.2M–$2.4M$1.2M–$2.4M

These figures aren’t theoretical. They reflect the kind of recovery specialty contractors typically see when they close the five gaps above through better time capture, better material tracking, contract entitlement enforcement, and periodic profitability review on service customers. The work is operational rather than heroic, and the recovery usually pays for the platform investment inside the first year.

This is why service profitability is one of the most actionable problems for a specialty contractor to fix. The revenue is already earned. The cost is already incurred. The only thing keeping the margin from showing up correctly is the gap between field activity and the financial system.

How AI and Real-Time Data Are Changing the Service Profitability Picture

For the broader picture on how AI tools are compressing this gap in 2026, see How AI Is Quietly Changing Specialty Contractor Finance in 2026.

The short version: AI inside a connected financial system is one of the most direct ways specialty contractors are closing the time-and-billing accuracy gap in service work specifically. Service ticket coding, billing readiness, and anomaly detection are three production-grade AI use cases in service department finance today.

The contractors getting the most out of these tools are not the ones with the biggest AI investment. They are the ones with the cleanest underlying service data. AI on a clean service ticket flow surfaces margin risk in time to act. AI on a chaotic service ticket flow surfaces faster versions of the same chaos.

Where Sage Intacct Construction Fits in Service Profitability

Sage Intacct Construction is the cloud-native construction ERP specialty contractors run when they want service, install, and maintenance work in one financial system. The platform supports the specific workflow that closes the service profitability gap:

Platform capabilityWhat it closesTime capture at the point of workTechnician hours that used to get entered three days laterInventory and parts tied to the jobParts pulled from the truck now follow the cost to the right jobContract entitlement enforcementWork that exceeds entitlement gets flagged; work under entitlement isn’t over-billedReal-time profitability visibilityCustomers drifting toward unprofitable margin get flagged continuously, not annually

At Alliance Solutions Group, our team configures Sage Intacct Construction around the actual service operations the contractor runs today: how technicians capture time, how parts flow from trucks to jobs, how service contracts are structured, how billing cycles are set up. Take a self-guided tour of Sage Intacct Construction to see how the platform handles service profitability without scheduling a call.

A Quick Service Profitability Diagnostic

Five questions that surface whether the firm is running on a P\&L that overstates service profitability, or one that reflects what’s actually happening. Each is either true today or it isn’t.

1. Service technicians log time inside the financial system at the point of work, not later from notes.  
2. When parts move from a truck to a service call, the cost follows the materials automatically.  
3. Service contract entitlements are visible in the system at the time of billing, not only at annual review.  
4. The team can name the dollar value of service work performed but not yet billed within five minutes.  
5. Service customer profitability is reviewed continuously, not annually.

Two or more false answers means the reported service margin is overstating the real picture. Three or more means the 4-to-8 point gap is almost certainly showing up somewhere in the business.

Specialty Contractor Trade-Specific Resources

Service profitability looks slightly different by trade. See how Sage Intacct can improve operations at your specific trade:

• Electrical Contractors
• Mechanical Contractors
• Plumbing Contractors
• Fire & Life Safety Contractors

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the service department P\&L look more profitable than the actual margin? The P\&L only reports what got billed against what got charged to that job. Service revenue that should have been billed but wasn’t never shows up as a margin drag, because it never shows up at all. Material cost that landed on the wrong job inflates the wrong margin and deflates the right one. Service contracts under-billed against entitlements look like normal profitable contracts. The reported margin is accurate to what was captured. The gap is everything that wasn’t captured.

Where does service margin leak most in a typical specialty contractor? The five most common leak points are: technician hours that don’t get billed accurately, parts pulled from trucks without job allocation, service tickets billed in the wrong period, contract entitlements not enforced at billing time, and recurring service customers who became unprofitable without anyone noticing.

How much margin is typically hidden in the service profitability gap? Across the specialty contractor service businesses Alliance has worked with, the actual service margin tends to run 4 to 8 points lower than the reported margin. On a $5 million service business at 18% reported margin, that translates to $200,000 to $400,000 of recoverable revenue per year. The gap scales with service business size.

How does Sage Intacct Construction help specialty contractors close the service profitability gap? Sage Intacct Construction supports time capture at the point of work, inventory and parts tied directly to service jobs, contract entitlement enforcement at billing time, and continuous service customer profitability visibility. The workflow closes the gap between service work performed and the data the financial system uses to calculate margin.

What does Alliance Solutions do for specialty contractors running service businesses? Alliance Solutions Group helps specialty contractors configure Sage Intacct Construction around the actual service operations the firm runs: technician time capture, truck-to-job parts flow, service contract structures, and billing cycles. As Sage’s number one Intacct partner in North America with over 20 years of construction-only focus, the team works with service businesses across all the trades where this conversation matters.

The Margin Already on Your Books

Service department profitability is one of the most under-managed financial questions in specialty contracting. The reported margin tends to look fine, which means the conversation about what is actually happening rarely starts. The contractors that go looking for the gap typically find it. The recovery is real, the work to capture it is operational rather than heroic, and the systems to support the capture have matured.

Take a self-guided product tour to explore Sage Intacct Construction at your own pace, or book a demo to see what real-time service profitability visibility looks like for a specialty contractor at your size.

How to Cut Change Order Cycles from 90 Days to 15

A general contractor on a $90 million commercial project flags a change in the field on day 92 of the job. The framers got out ahead of the electrical sub. Walls went up before the high-voltage wiring went in. The fix is a real $180,000 change order. The PM tells the sub it will get handled. Work continues.

Here is how that change order moves on a typical manual workflow:

Total cycle: 126 days from field identification to payment.

That is the favorable version of the story. The unfavorable version is the one where the 90-day billing window in the contract closes before the change order is documented, and the contractor eats the cost.

This is the change order cycle most general contractors are still running. The contractors that have moved to 15-day approval cycles have a tactical playbook that compresses the cycle by removing the manual handoffs between field, PM, accounting, and owner. The technology to support it has matured. The math is well-documented.

Here is what the 15-day cycle actually looks like and what it is worth across an active portfolio.

Why the 60-to-90 Day Cycle Is the Standard

The 60-to-90 day cycle is not an outlier. For contractors running on manual or partially manual change order workflows, it is the norm. The reasons are structural, not operational:

• Multiple stakeholders, disconnected systems. PM, accounting, operations, and owner each work in different tools with manual handoffs between them.  
• Pricing requires data the PM doesn’t have at their desk. Subcontractor commitments, current material costs, and labor cost-to-date live in the financial system. The PM either guesses, asks accounting to pull it, or waits for month-end visibility.  
• Documentation gaps drive extra rounds. Change request and change order records often don’t match exactly. Owners ask questions. Revisions follow.  
• Approval and billing happen separately. Once the change order is finally approved, it sits another 15 to 30 days waiting to be rolled into the next pay application.

This is not a story about lazy teams or bad software. It is the predictable outcome of running a multi-stakeholder workflow across disconnected systems with manual handoffs.

The Financial Stakes Are Bigger Than Most Teams Realize

A 60-to-90 day cycle has three specific financial consequences that compound across a portfolio.

1. The 90-day billing window. Many construction contracts include a clause stating that if a change is not billed within 90 days of being identified, the owner is not legally obligated to pay. A cycle that takes 75 days to approve and 30 days to bill closes that window before billing happens. For contractors running on manual change order processes, this is one of the most common causes of unbilled change order revenue.  
2. Cash flow exposure. A change order that takes 60 days to approve, 30 days to bill, and 45 days to collect is 135 days of capital the contractor has financed out of working capital. On a $200,000 change order, that is meaningful interest cost or opportunity cost on the working capital. Multiply across an active portfolio and the impact gets meaningful fast.  
3. Margin disputes. Long cycles produce documentation drift. By the time an owner reviews a change order from 75 days ago, the supporting context (drawings, field photos, sub correspondence) is harder to assemble. Documentation gaps drive owner pushback. Pushback drives margin concessions.

What the 15-Day Cycle Actually Looks Like

The 15-day cycle is not a software feature. It is a workflow built on connected systems that handle the manual handoffs automatically. Here is the same change scenario, run on an integrated workflow:

DayStepWhat happens1Field identificationForeman opens a change request on a mobile field tool, attaches photos and documentation, submits to PM. Live record in both the field tool and the financial system.1–2PricingPM uses current subcontractor commitments and cost-to-date data live in the financial system. Pricing finalizes same day or next day.2–3Internal approvalApproval routes through the system automatically based on dollar threshold. Captured with audit trail.4–12Owner reviewOwner receives change request with full documentation, current pricing, and audit-ready supporting context. Typical 7-to-10 day review window.12–15BillingSystem updates project budget, client contract, and next pay application automatically. Owner billed within a few days of approval.

Total cycle: 15 days or less on most changes.

The cycle gets longer only when there is real disagreement about pricing or scope, which is the kind of friction that should exist in the workflow rather than being amplified by it.

The 15-day cycle requires three specific things to be true:

1. The field tool and the financial system are connected, with change records flowing between them automatically.
2. The financial system maintains current commitment data and cost-to-date data the PM can use for same-day pricing.
3. Approval routing is built into the system rather than running through email.

The Financial Impact of Closing the Cycle

The dollar impact of moving from a 60-to-90 day cycle to a 15-day cycle depends on portfolio scale and change order volume, but the math compounds quickly. Take a representative GC profile:

Portfolio metricValueActive jobs at any time30Change orders per job15Average change order value$40,000Annual change order volume$18 million

Now the recoverable revenue at different leakage rates:

Leakage rate (90-day window losses + documentation-driven margin concessions)Annual recoverable revenue2%$360,0003%$540,0005%$900,000

These figures aren’t aspirational. They reflect the kind of recovery contractors typically see when they move from a 60-to-90 day cycle to a 15-day cycle inside an integrated workflow. The recovery comes from the same source: closing the billing window before contractual exposure kicks in, and reducing documentation-driven margin concessions through cleaner first-submission documentation.

This is why change order workflow is the highest-impact tactical workflow change available to most general contractors. The revenue is already on the table. The workflow is the only thing keeping it from being captured.

Where Sage Intacct Construction Fits in the 15-Day Cycle

Sage Intacct Construction is the financial system that supports the 15-day change order cycle for general contractors. The three platform capabilities that the cycle depends on:

CapabilityWhat it doesLive change order recordsChange requests are live records tied directly to the project budget and client contract. Every stakeholder sees the same data, with attached documentation.Real-time cost data for same-day pricingSubcontractor commitments and cost-to-date data update continuously. The PM pricing a change order works from current data.Integrated approval and billingApproved change requests convert to project change orders in a single action. Project budget, client contract, and next pay app update simultaneously.

For a closer look at how Sage Intacct treats committed costs as the first line of control on jobs (the foundation for confident change order pricing), see Why Sage Intacct Treats Committed Costs as the First Line of Control for Electrical Jobs.

At Alliance Solutions Group, we focus on Implementation, configuration, and ongoing support that’s all built specifically for construction firms. Our team configures Sage Intacct Construction around the actual change order workflow the contractor runs today, not around a generic process template. See how Alliance helps GCs control margin and master change, or take a self-guided product tour to see the change management workflow in the platform.

A Diagnostic GCs Can Run Today

A short self-assessment surfaces whether the firm is running a 60-to-90 day cycle without realizing it. Run these with the project management and accounting leads in the room.

Field-to-finance flow

• When a change is identified in the field, how does the financial system find out? Automatic or manual?  
• How long after field identification does the change show up as a record in the financial system?

Pricing speed

• When a PM prices a change order, is the cost data current as of today, or current as of the last close?  
• Can the PM price a change order confidently on the same day it comes in?

Approval and billing

• How are change order approvals routed? In the financial system or through email?  
• Once a change order is approved, how many days pass before it is reflected in the next pay application?

If any of the answers involve email, spreadsheets, or “we have to ask accounting,” the cycle is longer than it needs to be. If most answers involve “the system handles it,” the firm is already running near the 15-day target.

The Cycle Is the Lever

Change order workflow is one of the highest-impact tactical changes a general contractor can make. The revenue is already earned. The work is already done. The cycle time between work and billing is the only thing keeping the revenue from being captured cleanly.

The contractors moving to 15-day cycles are not running faster versions of the same process. They are running a different process built on connected systems. The path from 60-to-90 days to 15 days is well-traveled, the ROI is well-documented, and the technology to support it has matured.

For the broader 2026 outlook on labor, tariffs, and AI that shape the financial environment around change order management, see What General Contractors Are Watching in 2026: Labor, Tariffs, and Where AI Is Actually Showing Up.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the typical change order cycle take 60 to 90 days? The cycle takes that long because it involves multiple stakeholders (PM, accounting, operations, owner) running on disconnected systems with manual handoffs. Each handoff adds time. Documentation gaps drive additional rounds of clarification. Pricing depends on data that may not be current. The 60-to-90 day cycle is the predictable outcome of that workflow, not an outlier.

What is the 90-day billing rule in construction contracts? Many construction contracts include a clause stating that if a change is not billed within 90 days of being identified, the owner is not legally obligated to pay it. For contractors running 60-to-90 day approval cycles plus a billing lag, the contractual window can close before the change order is invoiced. This is one of the most common causes of unbilled change order revenue for contractors running on manual workflows.

How does Sage Intacct Construction support a 15-day change order cycle? Sage Intacct Construction maintains change orders as live records tied directly to the project budget and client contract. Real-time commitment and cost data let PMs price change orders the same day they come in. Approval routing is built into the system rather than running through email. When approved, the system updates the project budget, client contract, and next pay application in a single action.

What does a 15-day cycle save a typical general contractor? A GC running 30 active jobs with 15 change orders per job processes roughly 450 change orders annually. If the average change order is $40,000, that is $18 million in annual change order volume. Recovering even 2% of that volume from the 90-day billing window and documentation-driven margin concessions is $360,000 of recoverable revenue per year. At 5% recovery, it is $900,000.

How long does it take to implement Sage Intacct Construction with Alliance? Implementation timelines vary by the size of the contractor, the number of entities, and the complexity of the existing financial environment. Alliance Solutions Group runs a proven go-live discipline focused on faster implementations, cleaner data migration, and stronger ROI from day one.

What does Alliance Solutions do for general contractors managing change orders? Alliance Solutions Group helps general contractors compress change order cycles by configuring Sage Intacct Construction around the actual workflow the firm runs today. As Sage’s number one Intacct partner in North America with over 20 years of construction-only focus, the team has implemented the 15-day cycle across contractors of every size and project type.

Close the Cycle, Capture the Margin

The 60-to-90 day change order cycle is a real margin tax. The 15-day cycle is a well-documented alternative built on connected systems and integrated workflows. The contractors making the move are not the ones taking the biggest technology risks. They are the ones acting on the math that the recoverable revenue is already on the table.

Take a self-guided product tour to explore Sage Intacct Construction’s change management workflow at your own pace, or book a product demo to see what a 15-day cycle looks like for a contractor your size.

What General Contractors Are Watching in 2026: Labor, Tariffs, and Where AI Is Actually Showing Up

A construction CFO sits down for a Monday leadership meeting. The agenda is familiar. Backlog is solid. Margin pressure is real. Two jobs are running tight. The team is short three estimators and a controller. Tariff costs on steel and electrical components shifted again last week. The AI tools the COO has been testing for six months are starting to produce real numbers in accounts payable.

This is the operating reality for general contractors in 2026. Three forces are reshaping construction finance at the same time:

1. A workforce shortage that is not going away  
2. Tariff and supply chain volatility that has become permanent rather than episodic  
3. An AI moment that is finally landing in the parts of the business where it can produce ROI

None of these are surprises. All of them are now showing up in the financials in ways that are harder to ignore. Here is what to track on each and why each one ties back to the same conversation about real-time financial visibility.

The Labor Squeeze Is Now a Financial Risk, Not Just an HR Problem

The labor shortage stopped being an HR story and became a finance story in 2026. The numbers underneath that shift, per the AGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook:

• Additional workers the construction sector needs by 2033: 8.4 million
• Young people in the US who say they’re interested in the trade: 3%
• Firms struggling to find craft workers: 82%
• Firms struggling to fill salaried roles: 80%
• Firms that raised base pay 4 to 6% in the past year: 46%

The financial impact is higher payroll AND productivity volatility. Across the construction sector, productivity outcomes in the past year broke down roughly like this:

• Productivity gains: 32% of firms  
• No change: 41% of firms  
• Productivity declines: 24% of firms

A GC that lost three weeks of crew time on a tight margin job can see a quarter of expected margin disappear before anyone notices. Workforce planning used to live in HR. In 2026 it lives in finance, because every labor decision now has a margin consequence that needs to be visible in the same cadence as the work itself. Contractors operating on monthly close cycles see labor variances show up in the financials a month too late to do anything about them.

The contractors that respond well are the ones who can see labor cost and productivity at the job level in real time. The ones that are slower to see it pay for the lag in margin.

Tariffs Are No Longer Background Noise

Through 2025, tariff policy moved from a periodic conversation into a structural input on construction cost. The AGC and Sage Outlook found that roughly 70% of construction firms reported being affected by tariffs in 2025. The downstream behavior changed accordingly:

• Passed costs through to owners: 35%
• Accelerated purchases to lock in pricing: 32%
• Absorbed costs into margin: 11%

The third row is the one to watch. Margin absorption is the path of least resistance in the moment and the most expensive choice over time. A GC absorbing even 1% of project cost on tariff exposure across an active portfolio gives back a meaningful slice of expected profit, and the visibility into how much has been absorbed often doesn’t show up until the project closes out.

The firms responding most effectively are doing two specific things:

1. Running scenario modeling on commitment data weekly rather than monthly
2. Pricing change orders against current cost rather than estimate cost

Both moves require financial visibility on a daily or near-daily cadence. Monthly close cycles do not produce decisions that keep pace with tariff volatility.

For a longer look at how labor shortages, inflation, and tariff volatility are reshaping construction tech decisions, see Navigating Inflation, Labor Shortages, and Tariff Volatility with Smarter Construction Tech.

Where AI Is Actually Producing ROI in Construction

The AI conversation in construction has been long on hype and short on adoption for several years.This year, that started to change in one specific area: finance and back office workflows.

The AGC and Sage Outlook found that 61% of construction firms either use AI today or plan to increase AI investment in 2026. Where AI is actually showing up in production environments is narrower than the headlines suggest:

• Office and administrative workflows: 45%
• Estimating: 23%
• Preconstruction and design: 20%
• Recruiting: 16%

The pattern in finance specifically is the strongest example of AI producing real ROI rather than experimental output. The workflows where AI tools have moved from pilot to production fastest:

• Accounts payable automation  
• Invoice coding  
• Approval routing  
• Exception handling

The reason is structural: these workflows are high-volume, rule-driven, and the cost of error is contained. AI handles the routine 80% and surfaces the 20% that needs human judgment.

The contractors getting the most out of this are not the ones with the biggest AI investment. They are the ones with the cleanest underlying financial data. AI on a clean general ledger and a connected project budget produces useful output fast. AI on disconnected systems and manual data entry mostly produces faster versions of the same problems.

For a closer look at what AI in construction finance actually does in practice, see What Sage Copilot Actually Does (And Why Construction and Real Estate Teams Should Pay Attention) and ASG’s AI Commitments: AI You Can Actually Trust, Here’s How We Know.

The Common Thread: Real-Time Financial Visibility

The three forces above look like separate stories. They are actually one story told three ways.

• Labor productivity shows up in job cost data  
• Tariff impact shows up in commitment data  
• AI tools work best on clean, connected financial data

All three depend on the contractor’s ability to see what is happening across the financial system on the same clock as the work itself. A GC running on a monthly close cycle is reporting on labor productivity from four to six weeks ago, commitment data that may already be stale, and an AI environment built on top of data that needs reconciliation before it can be trusted. None of that is a recipe for responding well to the three forces reshaping the market.

The contractors that hold margin through 2026 are the ones that have already moved past monthly cadence in their financial reporting. That argument is the foundation of our pillar piece, The Real-Time Financials Every GC Needs to Protect Margin in 2026, which maps the four specific places GC margin leaks between closes.

Where Sage Intacct Construction Fits

The financial environment that supports labor visibility, tariff scenario modeling, and AI-ready data is one that posts field activity to the financial system within hours, reconciles committed against actual cost continuously, and runs consolidations across entities automatically.

Sage Intacct Construction is the cloud-native construction ERP built for that environment.

• AICPA’s preferred accounting solution  
• 50,000+ construction businesses use Sage  
• 48% of the ENR Top 400 contractors use Sage as their financial platform

For general contractors specifically, the platform supports:

• Real-time job costing tied to field activity  
• Multi-entity consolidation that runs automatically  
• Change order records tied directly to the project budget and the client contract  
• Audit-ready WIP available on demand  
• A foundation that AI tools (including Sage Copilot) can do useful work on without first requiring a data cleanup project

How GCs Are Preparing for the Rest of 2026

The contractors that move well through the rest of the year are doing three specific things differently:

1. Pulling labor cost into job-level visibility on a weekly cadence rather than monthly. This puts the labor productivity story into the conversation while there is still time to act on it.
2. Modeling tariff exposure on commitment data, not estimate data. Commitment data shows the cost of work already committed; estimate data shows the cost of work as bid. The first lets the team respond. The second tells the team what happened after the fact.
3. Deploying AI tools inside their existing financial system rather than alongside it. AI inside an integrated ERP works on clean data. AI bolted onto a stack of disconnected tools amplifies the disconnects.

None of those moves require ripping out the existing tech stack. They require a financial system that operates on the same cadence as the work the contractor is actually doing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the construction labor shortage expected to look like through 2026 and beyond? The AGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook projects the construction sector needs roughly 8.4 million more workers by 2033 to keep pace with demand, with only 3% of young people in the US expressing interest in the trade. In the near term, 82% of firms struggle to find craft workers and 80% struggle to fill salaried roles. The financial consequence is productivity volatility and wage inflation that contractors need to track on a weekly cadence to respond effectively.

How are tariffs affecting general contractor margin in 2026? Per the AGC and Sage 2026 Outlook, roughly 70% of construction firms reported being affected by tariffs in 2025. The most common responses were passing costs to owners (35%), accelerating purchases to lock in pricing (32%), and absorbing cost into margin (11%). Margin absorption is the most expensive long-term path because the cost shows up across an active portfolio and often does not surface until projects close out.

Where is AI actually being used in construction finance today? AI adoption in construction is concentrated in office and administrative workflows, where 45% of firms using AI are deploying it. AP automation, invoice coding, approval routing, and exception handling are the production-grade use cases. AI works best on top of clean, connected financial data, which means contractors with integrated ERPs are getting more value from AI tools than contractors running disconnected systems.

How does Sage Intacct Construction support labor cost visibility for general contractors? Sage Intacct Construction posts field activity to the financial system as the data is captured, which means labor cost shows up in job cost reports within hours rather than at month-end. Project budgets, change orders, and labor commitments are tied to live records that update together, so a productivity variance on a specific job shows up early enough for the project manager and finance team to respond.

What does Alliance Solutions do for general contractors navigating 2026? Alliance Solutions Group helps general contractors bring labor, materials, tariffs, and AI-ready financial data into one real-time financial view. The team configures Sage Intacct Construction to match how field and finance teams actually work, then provides ongoing support to keep the platform aligned as the business and the market change. Alliance is Sage’s number one Intacct partner in North America, with over 20 years dedicated to construction and real estate.

The Year Where Visibility Becomes the Standard

Labor, tariffs, and AI are not separate problems. They are three pressure points on the same financial function. The contractors that respond well in 2026 share one trait: they have built a financial system that produces decisions on the same clock as the work, not a month after the fact.

The rest of the year is going to reward contractors that see what is happening early enough to do something about it.

Take a self-guided product tour to explore Sage Intacct Construction at your own pace, or talk with one of our experts to see what a real-time financial stack looks like for a contractor your size.

How AI Is Quietly Changing Specialty Contractor Finance in 2026

A controller at a specialty contracting firm finishes Friday’s AP run. It used to take two days. This Friday it took four hours.

The AI tool that her accounting system added eighteen months ago is now coding 92% of invoices correctly on the first pass. She approves the exceptions. The rest moves through.

She is not running a futuristic operation. She is running an accounting team that adopted one specific AI tool inside an existing financial platform and trusted it to handle the boring 80% of the work. Her crew sizes did not change. Her customers did not change. The work the team is now able to do, because of the time AI gave back, did change.

This is the AI story most specialty contractors are not telling. It is not flashy. It does not involve robots on job sites. It involves boring back office workflows moving faster, more accurately, and with less staff effort than they did in 2024.

Here is where AI is actually showing up in specialty contractor finance in 2026, where it is not, and what to pay attention to as the technology matures.

Where AI Is Producing Real ROI in Construction Finance

The wins in 2026 are concentrated in three workflows where AI handles repetitive, rule-driven work that used to consume staff hours.

• Accounts payable: Invoice intake, GL coding, approval routing, exception handling — High-volume, rule-driven, contained cost of error
• Service ticket coding and billing readiness: Classifies tickets to the right job, contract, and billing window before they hit AR — Removes manual reconciliation that delays invoicing
• Financial reporting and anomaly detection: Flags unusual patterns in job cost data the day they happen — Early warning is the difference between a margin correction and a margin loss

The common thread across all three use cases: AI is helping specialty contractors compress the gap between work happening and that work showing up in the financial system. That gap is where revenue and margin slip for specialty contractors, which is the central thesis of our April pillar piece, Why Specialty Contractors Lose Money on Work They’ve Already Done. AI is one of the most direct levers for closing it.

Where AI Is Not Yet Living Up to the Hype

The same from the AGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook data that shows AI working in finance also shows it struggling in other parts of specialty contractor operations:

• Office and administrative workflows: 45% — Production-ready; ROI is clear
• Estimating: 23% — Depends on judgment, relationships, project context
• Preconstruction and design: 20% — Workflows vary widely by firm and trade
• Recruiting: 16% — Tight labor market is a relationship problem, not a data problem

For specialty contractors specifically, the AI use case that’s furthest from production is field-side automation: technician diagnosis tools, route optimization, work documentation from the field. The early results are interesting. The production-grade version is not here yet for most trades.

The practical read on AI in specialty contractor operations is that 2026 is the year it produces real ROI in finance. Field-side ROI is closer to 2027 or 2028 for most trades. Specialty contractors that focus AI investment on the finance use cases first are going to capture the available value the soonest.

The Hidden Requirement: AI Needs Clean, Connected Data

The specialty contractors getting real value from AI in 2026 share one trait that has nothing to do with which AI tool they chose. They run on integrated financial systems where the underlying data is clean and connected.

• Clean, connected, real-time: Useful output fast
• Disconnected systems, manual entry, reconciliation lag: Faster versions of the same problems

A specialty contractor whose service work, install work, and maintenance contracts live in three separate systems will get marginal value from AI because the AI cannot make sense of data that the contractor’s own team has to reconcile manually. This is the gap that determines who gets ROI from AI investment and who gets a faster version of the same chaos. It is also why AI investment without underlying system investment tends to disappoint.

For more on what AI inside a construction financial system actually does, see What Sage Copilot Actually Does (And Why Construction and Real Estate Teams Should Pay Attention). For the broader question of how to evaluate AI tools for trust and reliability, see ASG’s AI Commitments: AI You Can Actually Trust, Here’s How We Know.

What Specialty Contractors Should Be Asking About AI

The right AI questions for specialty contractor finance teams are tactical, not strategic. Four questions that surface where the firm is and what comes first:

1. How clean is our financial data? AI is downstream of data quality. A specialty contractor whose AP runs through Excel and email is not going to get useful AI output without first fixing the data flow. The investment in clean data pays for itself before any AI tool is deployed.
2. Where is staff time actually going? AP processing, invoice coding, manual approvals, service ticket reconciliation, and inventory tracking are the highest-impact targets for AI inside specialty contractor finance. Mapping where staff hours go reveals where AI investment will pay back the fastest.
3. Is our financial system AI-ready? Cloud-native systems with open APIs and structured data are AI-ready. On-premise legacy systems with custom data structures are not. Specialty contractors running on legacy software should answer the AI question alongside the platform question, not separately.
4. Are we comfortable with how the AI was built? The AI tools that hold up over time are the ones built by vendors with clear policies on data handling, model training, and customer trust. Specialty contractors deploying AI on financial data should know what their vendor commits to before signing.

Where Sage Intacct Construction Fits

Sage Intacct Construction is the cloud-native construction ERP specialty contractors run when they want their financial system to support service work, install work, and maintenance contracts in one place. It’s also the platform where AI tools (including Sage Copilot) can do useful work without first requiring a data cleanup project.

For specialty contractors specifically, Sage Intacct Construction supports:

• AI-assisted automation in accounts payable, approvals, and routine billing  
• Field activity flowing into real-time job costing as the work happens (gives AI current data to work with)  
• Inventory following materials across trucks, warehouses, and job sites (gives AI accurate context)  
• Multiple billing models inside the same system (no AI reconciliation across siloed tools)

Alliance Solutions Group configures Sage Intacct Construction around how specialty contractors actually run, not around how generic accounting software thinks they should. Take a self-guided tour of Sage Intacct Construction to see the platform that AI tools work on without scheduling a call.

A Quick AI Readiness Check for Specialty Contractors

Three questions that surface whether the firm is positioned to get real value from AI investment, or whether the AI question needs to wait for the platform question.

• Where does our financial data live? One system or several? Cloud-native or on-premise? Structured or improvised? Single answers point to AI readiness. Mixed answers point to a data and platform conversation first.  
• How fast does field activity become billable data? Same day or end of week? Automated or manual? Mobile or paper? Faster, more automated, more mobile equals more AI-ready.  
• Who owns the AI conversation? If the answer is “nobody yet,” that is the first thing to fix. AI without an owner inside the firm tends to be either oversold or ignored.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where is AI producing the most value in specialty contractor finance in 2026? According to the AGC and Sage 2026 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook, accounts payable automation, service ticket coding and billing readiness, and anomaly detection in job cost reporting are the three production-grade use cases. All three involve high-volume, rule-driven work that AI handles faster and more accurately than manual processes, which gives staff time back for higher-judgment work.

Why is AI not yet producing the same results in field operations? Field AI tools depend on the kind of variable, judgment-driven workflows that AI is still working out how to handle reliably. Estimating, design, and recruiting are also lower adoption rates because the work depends on relationships and context that AI tools have not yet matched. Most specialty contractors will see the field AI value in 2027 to 2028 rather than 2026.

Does AI work on a legacy accounting system? AI tools work best on cloud-native, integrated systems with clean structured data. Legacy systems with custom data structures, on-premise architecture, or significant manual reconciliation typically need a platform conversation before they need an AI conversation. Otherwise the AI investment produces marginal value.

What is the first AI use case a specialty contractor should deploy? Accounts payable automation is the most consistent first deployment because the ROI is fast, the data structure is well understood, and the cost of error is contained. Most specialty contractors see meaningful AP time reduction within the first few months of deployment.

How does Sage Intacct Construction support AI in specialty contractor finance? Sage Intacct Construction supports AI-assisted automation in accounts payable, approvals, and routine billing. The platform’s cloud-native architecture and connected data structure mean AI tools (including Sage Copilot) work on accurate, current data without first requiring a data cleanup project.

What does Alliance Solutions do for specialty contractors evaluating AI? Alliance Solutions Group helps specialty contractors evaluate where AI fits in their current financial system, where it does not, and what platform investment needs to come first. As Sage’s number one Intacct partner in North America with over 20 years of construction-only focus, the team works with the trade-specific realities of service, install, and maintenance operations.

The Quiet AI Era for Specialty Contractor Finance

The headline-grabbing AI use cases in construction are still mostly future tense. The quiet, ROI-producing AI use cases inside specialty contractor finance are already here. Contractors that focus their AI investment on AP automation, service ticket coding, and anomaly detection inside a connected financial system are the ones capturing real value.

The trade specifics depend on which kind of work the firm does most. Alliance has dedicated solutions for the trades where this conversation is loudest right now:

Electrical Contractors

Mechanical Contractors

Plumbing Contractors

Fire & Life Safety Contractors

Take a self-guided product tour to explore Sage Intacct Construction at your own pace, or book a demo with one of our experts to see what AI-ready construction finance looks like for a specialty contractor at your size and stage.